Akzidenz-Grotesk vs Inter
This Akzidenz-Grotesk vs Inter breakdown focuses on the details that usually matter: proportions, texture, and where each one fits best. With 82% similarity, Inter captures Akzidenz-Grotesk's neutral, functional character while optimizing for digital screens. Expect Inter to feel more contemporary; Akzidenz-Grotesk carries more historical character.
82% Similarity
Visual Comparison
Akzidenz-Grotesk
PremiumPremium font preview not available
Visit the foundry website to see samples
Inter
FreeAa Bb Cc 123
The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
0123456789 !@#$%^&*()
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Akzidenz-Grotesk | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Premium | Free |
| Classification | sans-serif | sans-serif |
| Variable Font | No | Yes |
| Weights | Multiple | Variable (100-900) |
| Italics | Yes | Yes |
| License | Commercial License Required | OFL-1.1 |
| Language Support | latin, latin-extended, cyrillic | latin, latin-extended, cyrillic, cyrillic-extended, greek, greek-extended, vietnamese |
| Source | Berthold | Google Fonts |
Which Should You Choose?
Recommended: Inter
- Free to use with open-source license
- Variable font offers flexible weight adjustment
- Broader language support
- No licensing costs for commercial projects
- Can be self-hosted or loaded from Google Fonts