Austin vs Bodoni

Austin and Bodoni are both serif typefaces sharing a didone foundation. Where Austin leans display, Bodoni brings expressive. Compare which suits your Editorial project.

Design DNA

Design overlap:60%

Austin

Structural
DidoneHigh Contrast
Visual
Elegant
Purpose
Display

Bodoni

Structural
DidoneHigh Contrast
Visual
ElegantExpressive

Highlighted traits are shared between both fonts

Visual Comparison

Austin

Premium

Bodoni

Premium

Feature Comparison

Feature Austin Bodoni
Type Premium Premium
Classification serif serif
Variable Font No No
Weights Multiple Multiple
Italics Yes Yes
License Commercial License Required Commercial License Required
Language Support latin, latin-extended latin, latin-extended, cyrillic
Source Commercial Type ITC

Best Use Cases

Editorial

Typography suited for magazines, newspapers, and long-form content. Editorial fo...

Austin Bodoni
Fashion

Typography for fashion brands, style publications, and luxury apparel. Fashion f...

Austin Bodoni
Luxury

Typography for luxury brands, high-end products, and premium services. Luxury fo...

Austin Bodoni
Display & Headlines

Typography designed to grab attention at large sizes. Display fonts feature dist...

Austin Bodoni

Where You'll See These Fonts

Bodoni

  • Vogue magazine
  • Harper's Bazaar
  • Calvin Klein
  • Nirvana album covers
  • Luxury fashion brands

Which Should You Choose?

Recommended: Austin

  • display design character
  • From Commercial Type
  • 2 free alternatives available
View Austin →

Consider: Bodoni

  • expressive design character
  • From ITC
  • 2 free alternatives available
  • Broader language support
View Bodoni →

Free Alternatives to Consider

Free fonts that can replace both Austin and Bodoni


Related Comparisons