Install FontSwap
Cascadia Code vs Input Mono
Cascadia Code and Input Mono are both mono typefaces sharing a monospace foundation. Where Cascadia Code leans modern, Input Mono brings readable. Compare which suits your Code project.
Design DNA
Design overlap:50%
Cascadia Code
Structural
Monospace
Visual
Modern
Purpose
Code
Input Mono
Structural
Monospace
Visual
Readable
Purpose
Code
Highlighted traits are shared between both fonts
Visual Comparison
Cascadia Code
Premium
Input Mono
Premium
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Cascadia Code | Input Mono |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Premium | Premium |
| Classification | mono | mono |
| Variable Font | No | No |
| Weights | Multiple | Multiple |
| Italics | Yes | Yes |
| License | Commercial License Required | Commercial License Required |
| Language Support | latin, latin-extended | latin, latin-extended |
| Source | Microsoft | Font Bureau |
Best Use Cases
Code & Programming
Typography for code editors, terminals, and developer documentation. Code fonts ...
Cascadia Input
Terminal
Typography for command-line interfaces, terminal emulators, and shell environmen...
Cascadia Input
Cascadia Input
Cascadia Input
Cascadia Input
Which Should You Choose?
Recommended: Cascadia Code
- modern design character
- Suited for Editors
- From Microsoft
- 3 free alternatives available
Consider: Input Mono
- readable design character
- Suited for Ide
- From Font Bureau
- 2 free alternatives available
Browse by Context
Free Alternatives to Consider
Free fonts that can replace both Cascadia Code and Input Mono