Cascadia Code vs SF Mono

Cascadia Code and SF Mono are both mono typefaces sharing a monospace foundation. Where Cascadia Code leans code, SF Mono brings tech. Compare which suits your Terminal project.

65% Similarity

Design DNA

Design overlap:50%

Cascadia Code

Structural
Monospace
Visual
Modern
Purpose
Code

SF Mono

Structural
Monospace
Visual
Modern
Purpose
Tech

Highlighted traits are shared between both fonts

Visual Comparison

Cascadia Code

Premium

SF Mono

Premium

Feature Comparison

Feature Cascadia Code SF Mono
Type Premium Premium
Classification mono mono
Variable Font No No
Weights Multiple Multiple
Italics Yes Yes
License Commercial License Required Commercial License Required
Language Support latin, latin-extended latin, latin-extended, cyrillic, greek
Source Microsoft Apple

Best Use Cases

Terminal

Typography for command-line interfaces, terminal emulators, and shell environmen...

Cascadia SF
Code & Programming

Typography for code editors, terminals, and developer documentation. Code fonts ...

Cascadia SF
Cascadia SF
Cascadia SF
Cascadia SF
Cascadia SF
Documentation

Typography for technical documentation, user guides, and help content. Documenta...

Cascadia SF

Where You'll See These Fonts

SF Mono

  • Xcode
  • macOS Terminal
  • Apple developer documentation
  • iOS development
  • Swift Playgrounds

Which Should You Choose?

Recommended: Cascadia Code

  • code design character
  • Suited for Code and Programming
  • From Microsoft
  • 3 free alternatives available
View Cascadia Code →

Consider: SF Mono

  • tech design character
  • Suited for Code Editors and Developer Tools
  • From Apple
  • 4 free alternatives available
  • Broader language support
View SF Mono →

Browse by Context

Free Alternatives to Consider

Free fonts that can replace both Cascadia Code and SF Mono


Related Comparisons