Input Mono vs Monaco
Input Mono and Monaco are both mono typefaces sharing a monospace foundation. Where Input Mono leans code, readable, Monaco brings tech, display. Compare which suits your Terminal project.
62% Similarity
Design DNA
Design overlap:17%
Input Mono
Structural
Monospace
Visual
Readable
Purpose
Code
Monaco
Structural
Monospace
Visual
Retro
Purpose
TechDisplay
Highlighted traits are shared between both fonts
Visual Comparison
Input Mono
Premium
Monaco
Premium
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Input Mono | Monaco |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Premium | Premium |
| Classification | mono | mono |
| Variable Font | No | No |
| Weights | Multiple | Multiple |
| Italics | Yes | Yes |
| License | Commercial License Required | Commercial License Required |
| Language Support | latin, latin-extended | latin, latin-extended |
| Source | Font Bureau | Apple |
Best Use Cases
Terminal
Typography for command-line interfaces, terminal emulators, and shell environmen...
Input Monaco
Code & Programming
Typography for code editors, terminals, and developer documentation. Code fonts ...
Input Monaco
Input Monaco
Input Monaco
Input Monaco
Input Monaco
Input Monaco
Where You'll See These Fonts
Monaco
- Classic Mac Terminal
- TextMate (legacy)
- BBEdit (legacy)
- Vintage Mac applications
- Retro computing enthusiasts
Which Should You Choose?
Recommended: Input Mono
- code, readable design character
- Suited for Code and Programming
- From Font Bureau
- 2 free alternatives available
Consider: Monaco
- tech, display design character
- Suited for Code Editors and Legacy Systems
- From Apple
- 4 free alternatives available
Browse by Context
Free Alternatives to Consider
Free fonts that can replace both Input Mono and Monaco
JetBrains Mono
85%85% to Input Mono · 78% to Monaco
Google Fonts · OFL-1.1 · Variable
Fira Mono
85%% to Input Mono · 85% to Monaco
Google Fonts · OFL-1.1 · 3 weights
Fira Code
82% Google Fonts · OFL-1.1 · Variable
Source Code Pro
82%% to Input Mono · 82% to Monaco
Google Fonts · OFL-1.1 · Variable