Monaco vs Fira Mono
This Monaco vs Fira Mono breakdown focuses on the details that usually matter: proportions, texture, and where each one fits best. With 85% similarity, Fira Mono shares Monaco's clean, neutral character with similar emphasis on practical code readability. In editor use, the deciding factors are usually italics, glyph differentiation, and overall texture at small sizes.
85% Similarity
Visual Comparison
Monaco
PremiumPremium font preview not available
Visit the foundry website to see samples
Fira Mono
FreeAa Bb Cc 123
The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
0123456789 !@#$%^&*()
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Monaco | Fira Mono |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Premium | Free |
| Classification | mono | mono |
| Variable Font | No | No |
| Weights | Multiple | 400, 500, 700 |
| Italics | Yes | No |
| License | Commercial License Required | OFL-1.1 |
| Language Support | latin, latin-extended | latin, latin-extended, cyrillic, cyrillic-extended, greek, greek-extended |
| Source | Apple | Google Fonts |
Which Should You Choose?
Recommended: Fira Mono
- Free to use with open-source license
- Broader language support
- No licensing costs for commercial projects
- Can be self-hosted or loaded from Google Fonts