Monaco vs SF Mono

Monaco and SF Mono are both mono typefaces sharing a monospace foundation. Where Monaco leans display, retro, SF Mono brings modern. Compare which suits your Code Editors project.

Design DNA

Design overlap:40%

Monaco

Structural
Monospace
Visual
Retro
Purpose
TechDisplay

SF Mono

Structural
Monospace
Visual
Modern
Purpose
Tech

Highlighted traits are shared between both fonts

Visual Comparison

Monaco

Premium

SF Mono

Premium

Feature Comparison

Feature Monaco SF Mono
Type Premium Premium
Classification mono mono
Variable Font No No
Weights Multiple Multiple
Italics Yes Yes
License Commercial License Required Commercial License Required
Language Support latin, latin-extended latin, latin-extended, cyrillic, greek
Source Apple Apple

Best Use Cases

Monaco SF
Terminal

Typography for command-line interfaces, terminal emulators, and shell environmen...

Monaco SF
Documentation

Typography for technical documentation, user guides, and help content. Documenta...

Monaco SF

Where You'll See These Fonts

Monaco

  • Classic Mac Terminal
  • TextMate (legacy)
  • BBEdit (legacy)
  • Vintage Mac applications
  • Retro computing enthusiasts

SF Mono

  • Xcode
  • macOS Terminal
  • Apple developer documentation
  • iOS development
  • Swift Playgrounds

Which Should You Choose?

Recommended: Monaco

  • display, retro design character
  • Suited for Legacy Systems and Retro Interfaces
  • From Apple
  • 4 free alternatives available
View Monaco →

Consider: SF Mono

  • modern design character
  • Suited for Developer Tools and Documentation
  • From Apple
  • 4 free alternatives available
  • Broader language support
View SF Mono →

Browse by Context

Free Alternatives to Consider

Free fonts that can replace both Monaco and SF Mono


Related Comparisons