Akzidenz-Grotesk vs Roboto

If you're evaluating Akzidenz-Grotesk as a baseline, this comparison shows how Roboto stacks up in real projects. With 78% similarity, Roboto shares Akzidenz-Grotesk's industrial, functional character with similar emphasis on clarity and neutrality. If you need more weights than Akzidenz-Grotesk offers, Roboto is usually the more flexible family.

78% Similarity

Visual Comparison

Akzidenz-Grotesk

Premium

Premium font preview not available

Visit the foundry website to see samples

Roboto

Free

Aa Bb Cc 123

The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog

ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
0123456789 !@#$%^&*()

Feature Comparison

Feature Akzidenz-Grotesk Roboto
Type Premium Free
Classification sans-serif sans-serif
Variable Font No Yes
Weights Multiple Variable (100-900)
Italics Yes Yes
License Commercial License Required Apache-2.0
Language Support latin, latin-extended, cyrillic latin, latin-extended, cyrillic, cyrillic-extended, greek, greek-extended, vietnamese
Source Berthold Google Fonts

Which Should You Choose?

Recommended: Roboto

  • Free to use with open-source license
  • Variable font offers flexible weight adjustment
  • Broader language support
  • No licensing costs for commercial projects
  • Can be self-hosted or loaded from Google Fonts
View Roboto →

Consider: Akzidenz-Grotesk

  • Original design with refined details
View Akzidenz-Grotesk →

Explore More