Austin vs GT Super

Austin and GT Super are both serif typefaces sharing a high contrast foundation. Where Austin leans didone, elegant, GT Super brings retro, editorial. Compare which suits your Editorial project.

70% Similarity

Design DNA

Design overlap:33%

Austin

Structural
High ContrastDidone
Visual
Elegant
Purpose
Display

GT Super

Structural
High Contrast
Visual
Retro
Purpose
DisplayEditorial

Highlighted traits are shared between both fonts

Visual Comparison

Austin

Premium

GT Super

Premium

Feature Comparison

Feature Austin GT Super
Type Premium Premium
Classification serif serif
Variable Font No No
Weights Multiple Multiple
Italics Yes Yes
License Commercial License Required Commercial License Required
Language Support latin, latin-extended latin, latin-extended
Source Commercial Type Grilli Type

Best Use Cases

Editorial

Typography suited for magazines, newspapers, and long-form content. Editorial fo...

Austin GT
Display & Headlines

Typography designed to grab attention at large sizes. Display fonts feature dist...

Austin GT
Fashion

Typography for fashion brands, style publications, and luxury apparel. Fashion f...

Austin GT
Luxury

Typography for luxury brands, high-end products, and premium services. Luxury fo...

Austin GT
Branding

Fonts that establish strong brand identity with distinctive character and versat...

Austin GT
Headlines

Typography designed specifically for titles, headers, and attention-grabbing tex...

Austin GT

Which Should You Choose?

Recommended: Austin

  • didone, elegant design character
  • Suited for Fashion and Luxury
  • From Commercial Type
  • 2 free alternatives available
View Austin →

Consider: GT Super

  • retro, editorial design character
  • Suited for Branding and Headlines
  • From Grilli Type
  • 2 free alternatives available
View GT Super →

Free Alternatives to Consider

Free fonts that can replace both Austin and GT Super


Related Comparisons