Berkeley Mono vs SF Mono

Berkeley Mono and SF Mono are both mono typefaces sharing a monospace foundation. Where Berkeley Mono leans code, minimal, SF Mono brings tech. Compare which suits your Terminal project.

63% Similarity

Design DNA

Design overlap:40%

Berkeley Mono

Structural
Monospace
Visual
ModernMinimal
Purpose
Code

SF Mono

Structural
Monospace
Visual
Modern
Purpose
Tech

Highlighted traits are shared between both fonts

Visual Comparison

Berkeley Mono

Premium

SF Mono

Premium

Feature Comparison

Feature Berkeley Mono SF Mono
Type Premium Premium
Classification mono mono
Variable Font No No
Weights Multiple Multiple
Italics Yes Yes
License Commercial License Required Commercial License Required
Language Support latin, latin-extended latin, latin-extended, cyrillic, greek
Source Berkeley Graphics Apple

Best Use Cases

Terminal

Typography for command-line interfaces, terminal emulators, and shell environmen...

Berkeley SF
Code & Programming

Typography for code editors, terminals, and developer documentation. Code fonts ...

Berkeley SF
Berkeley SF
Technology

Typography for tech companies, software products, and digital innovation. Tech f...

Berkeley SF
Berkeley SF
Berkeley SF
Documentation

Typography for technical documentation, user guides, and help content. Documenta...

Berkeley SF

Where You'll See These Fonts

SF Mono

  • Xcode
  • macOS Terminal
  • Apple developer documentation
  • iOS development
  • Swift Playgrounds

Which Should You Choose?

Recommended: Berkeley Mono

  • code, minimal design character
  • Suited for Code and Programming
  • From Berkeley Graphics
  • 3 free alternatives available
View Berkeley Mono →

Consider: SF Mono

  • tech design character
  • Suited for Code Editors and Developer Tools
  • From Apple
  • 4 free alternatives available
  • Broader language support
View SF Mono →

Browse by Context

Free Alternatives to Consider

Free fonts that can replace both Berkeley Mono and SF Mono


Related Comparisons