Garamond FB vs Times New Roman
Garamond FB and Times New Roman are both serif typefaces sharing a retro foundation. Where Garamond FB leans elegant, Times New Roman brings transitional. Compare which suits your Editorial project.
Design DNA
Design overlap:50%
Garamond FB
Times New Roman
Highlighted traits are shared between both fonts
Visual Comparison
Garamond FB
Premium
Times New Roman
Premium
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Garamond FB | Times New Roman |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Premium | Premium |
| Classification | serif | serif |
| Variable Font | No | No |
| Weights | Multiple | Multiple |
| Italics | Yes | Yes |
| License | Commercial License Required | Commercial License Required |
| Language Support | latin, latin-extended | latin, latin-extended, cyrillic, greek |
| Source | Font Bureau | Monotype |
Best Use Cases
Typography suited for magazines, newspapers, and long-form content. Editorial fo...
Typography optimized for printed materials, physical production, and offset or d...
Typography optimized for extended reading, book publishing, and literary content...
Typography for business documents, reports, and professional communications. Doc...
Typography for academic papers, research publications, and scholarly documents. ...
Which Should You Choose?
Recommended: Garamond FB
- elegant design character
- Suited for Books
- From Font Bureau
- 3 free alternatives available
Consider: Times New Roman
- transitional design character
- Suited for Documents and Academic
- From Monotype
- 2 free alternatives available
- Broader language support
Browse by Context
Free Alternatives to Consider
Free fonts that can replace both Garamond FB and Times New Roman
Libre Baskerville
82%% to Garamond FB · 82% to Times New Roman
EB Garamond
80%80% to Garamond FB · 85% to Times New Roman
Cormorant Garamond
72%Libre Caslon Text
62%