Google Sans Code vs Menlo

Google Sans Code and Menlo are both mono typefaces sharing a monospace foundation. The two share 73% design similarity overall. Compare which suits your Terminal project.

73% Similarity

Design DNA

Design overlap:75%

Google Sans Code

Structural
Monospace
Visual
Modern
Purpose
TechCode

Menlo

Structural
Monospace
Purpose
TechCode

Highlighted traits are shared between both fonts

Visual Comparison

Google Sans Code

Premium

Premium font preview not available

Visit the foundry website to see samples

Menlo

Premium

Feature Comparison

Feature Google Sans Code Menlo
Type Premium Premium
Classification mono mono
Variable Font No No
Weights Multiple Multiple
Italics Yes Yes
License Commercial License Required Commercial License Required
Language Support latin, latin-extended, cyrillic latin, latin-extended
Source Google Apple

Best Use Cases

Terminal

Typography for command-line interfaces, terminal emulators, and shell environmen...

Google Menlo
Google Menlo
UI Design

Typography optimized for user interfaces, design systems, and digital products. ...

Google Menlo
Documentation

Typography for technical documentation, user guides, and help content. Documenta...

Google Menlo
Code & Programming

Typography for code editors, terminals, and developer documentation. Code fonts ...

Google Menlo
Google Menlo
Google Menlo

Which Should You Choose?

Recommended: Google Sans Code

  • modern design character
  • Suited for Coding and Ui
  • From Google
  • 3 free alternatives available
  • Broader language support
View Google Sans Code →

Consider: Menlo

  • Suited for Code and Programming
  • From Apple
  • 2 free alternatives available
View Menlo →

Browse by Context

Free Alternatives to Consider

Free fonts that can replace both Google Sans Code and Menlo


Related Comparisons