Menlo vs SF Mono

Menlo and SF Mono are both mono typefaces sharing a monospace foundation. Where Menlo leans code, SF Mono brings modern. Compare which suits your Terminal project.

Design DNA

Design overlap:50%

Menlo

Structural
Monospace
Purpose
TechCode

SF Mono

Structural
Monospace
Visual
Modern
Purpose
Tech

Highlighted traits are shared between both fonts

Visual Comparison

Menlo

Premium

SF Mono

Premium

Feature Comparison

Feature Menlo SF Mono
Type Premium Premium
Classification mono mono
Variable Font No No
Weights Multiple Multiple
Italics Yes Yes
License Commercial License Required Commercial License Required
Language Support latin, latin-extended latin, latin-extended, cyrillic, greek
Source Apple Apple

Best Use Cases

Terminal

Typography for command-line interfaces, terminal emulators, and shell environmen...

Menlo SF
Code & Programming

Typography for code editors, terminals, and developer documentation. Code fonts ...

Menlo SF
Menlo SF
Menlo SF
Documentation

Typography for technical documentation, user guides, and help content. Documenta...

Menlo SF

Where You'll See These Fonts

SF Mono

  • Xcode
  • macOS Terminal
  • Apple developer documentation
  • iOS development
  • Swift Playgrounds

Which Should You Choose?

Recommended: Menlo

  • code design character
  • Suited for Code and Programming
  • From Apple
  • 2 free alternatives available
View Menlo →

Consider: SF Mono

  • modern design character
  • Suited for Code Editors and Developer Tools
  • From Apple
  • 4 free alternatives available
  • Broader language support
View SF Mono →

Browse by Context

Free Alternatives to Consider

Free fonts that can replace both Menlo and SF Mono


Related Comparisons