SF Mono vs Source Code Pro
This SF Mono vs Source Code Pro breakdown focuses on the details that usually matter: proportions, texture, and where each one fits best. With 82% similarity, Source Code Pro shares SF Mono's neutral, professional character with similar clean aesthetics. For code, pay attention to character distinction and italics; that’s where the differences usually show up.
82% Similarity
Visual Comparison
SF Mono
PremiumPremium font preview not available
Visit the foundry website to see samples
Source Code Pro
FreeAa Bb Cc 123
The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
0123456789 !@#$%^&*()
Feature Comparison
| Feature | SF Mono | Source Code Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Premium | Free |
| Classification | mono | mono |
| Variable Font | No | Yes |
| Weights | Multiple | Variable (100-900) |
| Italics | Yes | Yes |
| License | Commercial License Required | OFL-1.1 |
| Language Support | latin, latin-extended, cyrillic, greek | latin, latin-extended, cyrillic, cyrillic-extended, greek, vietnamese |
| Source | Apple | Google Fonts |
Which Should You Choose?
Recommended: Source Code Pro
- Free to use with open-source license
- Variable font offers flexible weight adjustment
- Broader language support
- No licensing costs for commercial projects
- Can be self-hosted or loaded from Google Fonts