Alexandria vs Red Hat Text
Alexandria and Red Hat Text are both freely available sans-serif fonts. They share 82% design similarity. This comparison helps you pick between two strong open-source options.
82% Similarity
Design DNA
Design overlap:50%
Alexandria
Visual
MinimalReadableModern
Red Hat Text
Visual
MinimalReadableFormal
Highlighted traits are shared between both fonts
Visual Comparison
Alexandria
FreeAa Bb Cc 123
The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
0123456789 !@#$%^&*()
Red Hat Text
FreeAa Bb Cc 123
The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
0123456789 !@#$%^&*()
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Alexandria | Red Hat Text |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Free | Free |
| Classification | sans-serif | sans-serif |
| Variable Font | Yes | Yes |
| Weights | Variable (100-900) | Variable (100-900) |
| Italics | No | Yes |
| License | OFL-1.1 | OFL-1.1 |
| Language Support | latin, latin-extended, arabic | latin, latin-extended |
| Source | Google Fonts | Google Fonts |
Weight & Style Coverage
Alexandria: Variable (100-900)
Red Hat Text: Variable (100-900)
| 5 shared weights
Alexandria
Red Hat Text
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
Which Should You Choose?
Recommended: Alexandria
- modern, clean character
- Popular in enterprise-corporate
- Variable font with continuous weight range
- Broader language and script support
- Free under OFL-1.1
Consider: Red Hat Text
- professional, clean character
- Popular in enterprise-corporate
- Variable font with continuous weight range
- Free under OFL-1.1