Average vs Baskerville

Average provides Baskerville's readable text character from a different design methodology. At 68% similarity, both prioritize comfortable extended reading, though Average offers only a single weight compared to Baskerville's comprehensive family.

68% Similarity

Visual Comparison

Average

Free

Aa Bb Cc 123

The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog

ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
0123456789 !@#$%^&*()

Baskerville

Premium

Feature Comparison

Feature Average Baskerville
Type Free Premium
Classification serif serif
Variable Font No No
Weights 400 Multiple
Italics No Yes
License OFL-1.1 Commercial License Required
Language Support latin, latin-extended latin, latin-extended, cyrillic, greek
Source Google Fonts Monotype

Where You'll See These Fonts

Baskerville

  • Canadian government
  • Stanford University
  • Kindle e-readers
  • Quality paperbacks
  • Academic journals

Which Should You Choose?

Recommended: Average

  • Shares Baskerville's readable character
  • Particularly suited for body text and academic content
  • Delivers a classic, traditional, readable aesthetic
  • Popular in education-academia and legal-law design
  • Rated as an easy replacement
View Average →

Consider: Baskerville

  • Original design with refined typographic details
  • Designed specifically for book-design and editorial
  • Used by Canadian government, Stanford University
  • Commercial license with professional support
View Baskerville →

Browse by Context

Free Alternatives to Consider

Other free alternatives to Baskerville


Related Comparisons