Average vs Baskerville
Average provides Baskerville's readable text character from a different design methodology. At 68% similarity, both prioritize comfortable extended reading, though Average offers only a single weight compared to Baskerville's comprehensive family.
68% Similarity
Visual Comparison
Average
FreeAa Bb Cc 123
The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
0123456789 !@#$%^&*()
Baskerville
Premium
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Average | Baskerville |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Free | Premium |
| Classification | serif | serif |
| Variable Font | No | No |
| Weights | 400 | Multiple |
| Italics | No | Yes |
| License | OFL-1.1 | Commercial License Required |
| Language Support | latin, latin-extended | latin, latin-extended, cyrillic, greek |
| Source | Google Fonts | Monotype |
Where You'll See These Fonts
Baskerville
- Canadian government
- Stanford University
- Kindle e-readers
- Quality paperbacks
- Academic journals
Which Should You Choose?
Recommended: Average
- Shares Baskerville's readable character
- Particularly suited for body text and academic content
- Delivers a classic, traditional, readable aesthetic
- Popular in education-academia and legal-law design
- Rated as an easy replacement
Consider: Baskerville
- Original design with refined typographic details
- Designed specifically for book-design and editorial
- Used by Canadian government, Stanford University
- Commercial license with professional support
Browse by Context
Free Alternatives to Consider
Other free alternatives to Baskerville