Baskerville vs EB Garamond

Choosing between Baskerville and EB Garamond comes down to whether you want the original tone or a practical open-source substitute. While EB Garamond is technically an old-style serif rather than transitional, it shares Baskerville's refined character and suitability for extended reading. Expect EB Garamond to feel more contemporary; Baskerville carries more historical character.

72% Similarity

Visual Comparison

Baskerville

Premium

Premium font preview not available

Visit the foundry website to see samples

EB Garamond

Free

Aa Bb Cc 123

The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog

ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
0123456789 !@#$%^&*()

Feature Comparison

Feature Baskerville EB Garamond
Type Premium Free
Classification serif serif
Variable Font No Yes
Weights Multiple Variable (100-900)
Italics Yes Yes
License Commercial License Required OFL-1.1
Language Support latin, latin-extended, cyrillic, greek latin, latin-extended, cyrillic, cyrillic-extended, greek, greek-extended, vietnamese
Source Monotype Google Fonts

Which Should You Choose?

Recommended: EB Garamond

  • Free to use with open-source license
  • Variable font offers flexible weight adjustment
  • Broader language support
  • No licensing costs for commercial projects
  • Can be self-hosted or loaded from Google Fonts
View EB Garamond →

Consider: Baskerville

  • Original design with refined details
View Baskerville →

Explore More