Dank Mono vs JetBrains Mono
This Dank Mono vs JetBrains Mono breakdown focuses on the details that usually matter: proportions, texture, and where each one fits best. With 82% similarity, JetBrains Mono offers comparable programming ligatures and pleasant italics in a more professionally refined package. In editor use, the deciding factors are usually italics, glyph differentiation, and overall texture at small sizes.
82% Similarity
Visual Comparison
Dank Mono
PremiumPremium font preview not available
Visit the foundry website to see samples
JetBrains Mono
FreeAa Bb Cc 123
The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
0123456789 !@#$%^&*()
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Dank Mono | JetBrains Mono |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Premium | Free |
| Classification | mono | mono |
| Variable Font | No | Yes |
| Weights | Multiple | Variable (100-900) |
| Italics | Yes | Yes |
| License | Commercial License Required | OFL-1.1 |
| Language Support | latin, latin-extended | latin, latin-extended, cyrillic, cyrillic-extended, greek, vietnamese |
| Source | Phil Plückthun | Google Fonts |
Which Should You Choose?
Recommended: JetBrains Mono
- Free to use with open-source license
- Variable font offers flexible weight adjustment
- Broader language support
- No licensing costs for commercial projects
- Can be self-hosted or loaded from Google Fonts