Frutiger vs Open Sans
This Frutiger vs Open Sans breakdown focuses on the details that usually matter: proportions, texture, and where each one fits best. With 80% similarity, Open Sans captures Frutiger's humanist proportions with similar emphasis on digital legibility. Open Sans keeps the neutral vibe but is tuned for modern digital typography.
80% Similarity
Visual Comparison
Frutiger
PremiumPremium font preview not available
Visit the foundry website to see samples
Open Sans
FreeAa Bb Cc 123
The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
0123456789 !@#$%^&*()
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Frutiger | Open Sans |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Premium | Free |
| Classification | sans-serif | sans-serif |
| Variable Font | No | Yes |
| Weights | Multiple | Variable (100-900) |
| Italics | Yes | Yes |
| License | Commercial License Required | Apache-2.0 |
| Language Support | latin, latin-extended, cyrillic, greek | latin, latin-extended, cyrillic, cyrillic-extended, greek, greek-extended, vietnamese |
| Source | Linotype | Google Fonts |
Which Should You Choose?
Recommended: Open Sans
- Free to use with open-source license
- Variable font offers flexible weight adjustment
- Broader language support
- No licensing costs for commercial projects
- Can be self-hosted or loaded from Google Fonts