Optima vs EB Garamond

If you're evaluating Optima as a baseline, this comparison shows how EB Garamond stacks up in real projects. With 72% similarity, EB Garamond, though a serif, shares Optima's classical inspiration and refined elegance. Expect EB Garamond to feel more contemporary; Optima carries more historical character.

72% Similarity

Visual Comparison

Optima

Premium

Premium font preview not available

Visit the foundry website to see samples

EB Garamond

Free

Aa Bb Cc 123

The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog

ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
0123456789 !@#$%^&*()

Feature Comparison

Feature Optima EB Garamond
Type Premium Free
Classification sans-serif serif
Variable Font No Yes
Weights Multiple Variable (100-900)
Italics Yes Yes
License Commercial License Required OFL-1.1
Language Support latin, latin-extended, greek latin, latin-extended, cyrillic, cyrillic-extended, greek, greek-extended, vietnamese
Source Linotype Google Fonts

Which Should You Choose?

Recommended: EB Garamond

  • Free to use with open-source license
  • Variable font offers flexible weight adjustment
  • Broader language support
  • No licensing costs for commercial projects
  • Can be self-hosted or loaded from Google Fonts
View EB Garamond →

Consider: Optima

  • Original design with refined details
View Optima →

Explore More