Archivo vs BIZ UDGothic
Archivo and BIZ UDGothic are both freely available sans-serif fonts. They share 71% design similarity. This comparison helps you pick between two strong open-source options.
71% Similarity
Design DNA
Design overlap:25%
Archivo
Visual
ReadableBoldModern
BIZ UDGothic
Visual
ReadableMinimal
Highlighted traits are shared between both fonts
Visual Comparison
Archivo
FreeAa Bb Cc 123
The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
0123456789 !@#$%^&*()
BIZ UDGothic
FreeAa Bb Cc 123
The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
0123456789 !@#$%^&*()
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Archivo | BIZ UDGothic |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Free | Free |
| Classification | sans-serif | sans-serif |
| Variable Font | Yes | No |
| Weights | Variable (100-900) | 400, 700 |
| Italics | Yes | No |
| License | OFL-1.1 | OFL-1.1 |
| Language Support | latin, latin-extended, vietnamese | latin, latin-extended, cyrillic, japanese |
| Source | Google Fonts | Google Fonts |
Weight & Style Coverage
Archivo: Variable (100-900)
BIZ UDGothic: 2 weights
| 2 shared weights
Archivo
BIZ UDGothic
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
Which Should You Choose?
Recommended: Archivo
- strong, functional character
- Popular in enterprise-corporate
- Variable font with continuous weight range
- Free under OFL-1.1
Consider: BIZ UDGothic
- clean, professional character
- Popular in enterprise-corporate and accessibility
- Broader language and script support
- Free under OFL-1.1