Archivo vs Urbanist
Archivo and Urbanist are both freely available sans-serif fonts. They share 73% design similarity. This comparison helps you pick between two strong open-source options.
73% Similarity
Design DNA
Design overlap:20%
Archivo
Visual
ModernBoldReadable
Urbanist
Structural
Geometric
Visual
ModernMinimal
Highlighted traits are shared between both fonts
Visual Comparison
Archivo
FreeAa Bb Cc 123
The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
0123456789 !@#$%^&*()
Urbanist
FreeAa Bb Cc 123
The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
0123456789 !@#$%^&*()
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Archivo | Urbanist |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Free | Free |
| Classification | sans-serif | sans-serif |
| Variable Font | Yes | Yes |
| Weights | Variable (100-900) | Variable (100-900) |
| Italics | Yes | Yes |
| License | OFL-1.1 | OFL-1.1 |
| Language Support | latin, latin-extended, vietnamese | latin, latin-extended |
| Source | Google Fonts | Google Fonts |
Weight & Style Coverage
Archivo: Variable (100-900)
Urbanist: Variable (100-900)
| 9 shared weights
Archivo
Urbanist
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
Which Should You Choose?
Recommended: Archivo
- strong, functional character
- Popular in enterprise-corporate
- Variable font with continuous weight range
- Broader language and script support
- Free under OFL-1.1
Consider: Urbanist
- geometric, minimal character
- Variable font with continuous weight range
- Free under OFL-1.1