Epilogue vs Red Hat Text

Epilogue and Red Hat Text are both freely available sans-serif fonts. They share 77% design similarity. This comparison helps you pick between two strong open-source options.

77% Similarity

Design DNA

Design overlap:20%

Epilogue

Visual
ReadableModernBold

Red Hat Text

Visual
ReadableMinimalFormal

Highlighted traits are shared between both fonts

Visual Comparison

Epilogue

Free

Aa Bb Cc 123

The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog

ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
0123456789 !@#$%^&*()

Red Hat Text

Free

Aa Bb Cc 123

The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog

ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
0123456789 !@#$%^&*()

Feature Comparison

Feature Epilogue Red Hat Text
Type Free Free
Classification sans-serif sans-serif
Variable Font Yes Yes
Weights Variable (100-900) Variable (100-900)
Italics Yes Yes
License OFL-1.1 OFL-1.1
Language Support latin, latin-extended, vietnamese latin, latin-extended
Source Google Fonts Google Fonts

Weight & Style Coverage

Epilogue: Variable (100-900)
Red Hat Text: Variable (100-900)
| 5 shared weights
Epilogue
Red Hat Text
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900

Which Should You Choose?

Recommended: Epilogue

  • modern, contemporary character
  • Variable font with continuous weight range
  • Broader language and script support
  • Free under OFL-1.1
View Epilogue →

Consider: Red Hat Text

  • professional, clean character
  • Popular in enterprise-corporate
  • Variable font with continuous weight range
  • Free under OFL-1.1
View Red Hat Text →
FontSwap Extension

Preview this replacement live on any site with FontSwap.

Install FontSwap →

Related Comparisons