Arial vs Arimo
Arimo was built to be a drop-in for Arial, matching its metrics exactly while redrawing the letterforms for screen rendering.
Design DNA
Design overlap:25%
Arial
Arimo
Highlighted traits are shared between both fonts
Visual Comparison
Arial
Premium
Arimo
FreeAa Bb Cc 123
The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
0123456789 !@#$%^&*()
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Arial | Arimo |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Premium | Free |
| Classification | sans-serif | sans-serif |
| Variable Font | No | Yes |
| Weights | Multiple | Variable (100-900) |
| Italics | Yes | Yes |
| License | Commercial License Required | OFL-1.1 |
| Language Support | latin, latin-extended, cyrillic, greek, hebrew | latin, latin-extended, cyrillic, cyrillic-extended, greek, greek-extended, hebrew, vietnamese |
| Source | Monotype | Google Fonts |
Best Use Cases
Typography for business documents, reports, and professional communications. Doc...
Typography for established businesses, enterprise software, and professional ser...
Typography optimized for websites, landing pages, and web applications. Web font...
Typography optimized for user interfaces, design systems, and digital products. ...
Typography for wayfinding, environmental graphics, and public signage. Signage f...
Typography for slide decks, keynotes, and presentation materials. Presentation f...
Which Should You Choose?
Consider: Arial
- Shares Arial's minimal character
- Particularly suited for documents and corporate
- Variable font with continuous weight adjustment
- Supports 8 scripts including cyrillic and cyrillic-extended
- Delivers a neutral, practical, familiar aesthetic
Recommended: Arimo
- Original design with refined typographic details
- Designed specifically for documents and corporate
- Commercial license with professional support
Browse by Context
Free Alternatives to Consider
Other free alternatives to Arial