DIN vs Frutiger

DIN and Frutiger are both sans-serif typefaces sharing a readable foundation. Where DIN leans signage, tech, Frutiger brings humanist, warm. Compare which suits your Signage project.

Design DNA

Design overlap:20%

DIN

Visual
Readable
Purpose
SignageTech

Frutiger

Structural
Humanist
Visual
ReadableWarm

Highlighted traits are shared between both fonts

Visual Comparison

DIN

Premium
1 / 5DIN specimen 1 of 5
1x
1 / 5

Frutiger

Premium
1 / 5Frutiger specimen 1 of 5
1x
1 / 5

Feature Comparison

Feature DIN Frutiger
Type Premium Premium
Classification sans-serif sans-serif
Variable Font No No
Weights Multiple Multiple
Italics Yes Yes
License Commercial License Required Commercial License Required
Language Support latin, latin-extended, cyrillic latin, latin-extended, cyrillic, greek
Source Linotype Linotype

Best Use Cases

Signage

Typography for wayfinding, environmental graphics, and public signage. Signage f...

DIN Frutiger
Technical
DIN Frutiger
Automotive

Typography for automotive brands, vehicle interfaces, and transportation design....

DIN Frutiger
Industrial
DIN Frutiger
Gaming

Typography for video games, esports, and interactive entertainment. Gaming fonts...

DIN Frutiger
E-commerce

Typography optimized for online retail, marketplaces, and shopping experiences. ...

DIN Frutiger
Fintech

Typography optimized for financial technology applications. These fonts convey t...

DIN Frutiger
Wayfinding

Typography for navigation systems, directional signage, and environmental graphi...

DIN Frutiger
Corporate

Typography for established businesses, enterprise software, and professional ser...

DIN Frutiger
Healthcare

Typography for medical, wellness, and healthcare applications. Healthcare fonts ...

DIN Frutiger

Where You'll See These Fonts

DIN

  • German road signs
  • Automotive industry
  • Technical documentation
  • Industrial design
  • European transport

Frutiger

  • Airport signage
  • Healthcare systems
  • Transportation
  • Government forms
  • Pharmaceutical packaging

Which Should You Choose?

Recommended: DIN

  • signage, tech design character
  • Suited for Technical and Automotive
  • From Linotype
  • 3 free alternatives available
View DIN →

Consider: Frutiger

  • humanist, warm design character
  • Suited for Wayfinding and Corporate
  • From Linotype
  • 3 free alternatives available
  • Broader language support
View Frutiger →

Browse by Context

DIN

For Fintech For Gaming For E-commerce For Signage For Automotive With Readable

Frutiger

For Healthcare For Corporate For Signage For Wayfinding With Humanist With Readable

Free Alternatives to Consider

Free fonts that can replace both DIN and Frutiger

Exo

85%
Google Fonts · OFL-1.1 · Variable

Saira

82%
Google Fonts · OFL-1.1 · Variable

Hind

82%

% to DIN · 82% to Frutiger

Google Fonts · OFL-1.1 · 5 weights

Open Sans

80%

% to DIN · 80% to Frutiger

Google Fonts · Apache-2.0 · Variable

Related Comparisons

DIN vs Autoradiographic

Frutiger vs Clearview

DIN vs Exo

85% similarity

DIN vs Exo

85% similarity

DIN

View all alternatives

Frutiger

View all alternatives

sans-serif Fonts

Browse category
← Back to Home