Install FontSwap
Inter vs Mulish
Inter and Mulish are both freely available sans-serif fonts often used as alternatives to the same premium typefaces. Inter serves as a replacement for 100 premium fonts while Mulish covers 3. This comparison helps you pick between two strong open-source options.
Design DNA
Design overlap:100%
Inter
Mulish
Highlighted traits are shared between both fonts
Visual Comparison
Inter
FreeAa Bb Cc 123
The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
0123456789 !@#$%^&*()
Mulish
FreeAa Bb Cc 123
The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
0123456789 !@#$%^&*()
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Inter | Mulish |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Free | Free |
| Classification | sans-serif | sans-serif |
| Variable Font | Yes | Yes |
| Weights | Variable (100-900) | Variable (100-900) |
| Italics | Yes | Yes |
| License | OFL-1.1 | OFL-1.1 |
| Language Support | latin, latin-extended, cyrillic, cyrillic-extended, greek, greek-extended, vietnamese | latin, latin-extended, cyrillic, cyrillic-extended, vietnamese |
| Source | Google Fonts | Google Fonts |
Best Use Cases
Fonts that establish strong brand identity with distinctive character and versat...
Typography suited for magazines, newspapers, and long-form content. Editorial fo...
Typography optimized for user interfaces, design systems, and digital products. ...
Typography for tech companies, software products, and digital innovation. Tech f...
Typography for desktop and web applications, software interfaces, and digital to...
Typography for established businesses, enterprise software, and professional ser...
Typography for advertising, marketing campaigns, and promotional materials. Adve...
Typography for slide decks, keynotes, and presentation materials. Presentation f...
Typography for product packaging, labels, and consumer goods. Packaging fonts mu...
Typography optimized for printed materials, physical production, and offset or d...
Weight & Style Coverage
Performance Comparison
| Metric | Inter | Mulish |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 | 60/100 |
| File Size | 525.2 KB | 251.9 KB |
| Weights | 9 (var) | 9 (var) |
| Italics | Yes | Yes |
| Variable Font | Yes (2 axes) | Yes (1 axes) |
| Language Groups | 7 | 5 |
| CDN Delivery | Yes | Yes |
| x-Height Ratio | 0.546 | 0.5 |
| Cap Height Ratio | 0.728 | 0.705 |
Mulish is 52% lighter for the standard weight set (400, 400i, 700).
Which Should You Choose?
Recommended: Inter
- Replaces 100 premium fonts
- modern, clean character
- Popular in enterprise-corporate and financial-services
- Variable font with continuous weight range
- Broader language and script support
Consider: Mulish
- Replaces 3 premium fonts
- minimal, modern character
- Popular in enterprise-corporate and financial-services
- Variable font with continuous weight range
- Free under OFL-1.1
Premium Font Coverage
Both replace (1)
Only Inter (99)
Only Mulish (2)
Inter covers 100 premium fonts vs Mulish's 3